Web Survey Bibliography
Title Visual Analogue Scales: Non-linear Data Categorization by Transformation with Reduced Extremes
Author Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
Year 2006
Access date 20.09.2006
Abstract Two different ways of analyzing data from visual analogue scales (VAS) have been compared to one another: linear transformation that is commonly used, and transformation with reduced extremes. The VAS that have been examined here consist of horizontal lines with verbal anchors at both ends. VAS values can be determined accurate to a pixel and fall into the category of continuous response formats. By generating data on interval scale level, they meet important requirements for the applicability of parametric procedures. In two online experiments the influence of VAS on the respondent's way of answering questions has been examined in comparison to (4-, 5-, and 8-point) categorical scales.
As expected, the two response formats had no influence on central statistical parameters. Although, on the face of it, they appeared to be equivalent, it could be shown that the commonly used linear transformation of VAS' values results in systematic differences. This means that the use of different response formats can lead to different interpretations. An alternative way of categorizing data obtained from VAS is therefore suggested, and in the first experiment it could be demonstrated that by using this alternative data from both response formats turned out to be actually equivalent.
To be able to compare the frequencies of categorical scales with VAS, segments of the VAS have to be put together to form categories. Two ways of categorizing data have been examined. The first one consists in linear transformation, where equal intervals of the VAS are put together to form one category. This leads to equally spaced categories with same size and distance and represents the transfer of the VAS' characteristics onto categorical scales. The second way is the use of transformation with reduced extremes. The segments on the VAS that are put together to form the extreme categories are smaller here than the segments that form the other categories. Transformation with reduced extremes leads to greater correspondence with the frequencies on categorical scales and, all in all, is clearly superior to linear transformation. Since on VAS the extreme categories are represented by smaller intervals than the other categories, they appear to be less important to the respondent. This means that the centers of categories and categorical scales have different distances so that they are not perceived as equidistant.
In a second experiment - to take into account the reduced distances of the extreme categories - the categorical scales were optically modified according to the transformation procedure with reduced extremes. The space between the radio buttons (i.e. categories) is no longer the same but represents the reduced extremes. The distance between the outermost button and the adjoining one is smaller than the distance between the other buttons. The aim is to create a scale whose categories are perceived as having the same distances so that the required equidistance is no longer violated.
As expected, the two response formats had no influence on central statistical parameters. Although, on the face of it, they appeared to be equivalent, it could be shown that the commonly used linear transformation of VAS' values results in systematic differences. This means that the use of different response formats can lead to different interpretations. An alternative way of categorizing data obtained from VAS is therefore suggested, and in the first experiment it could be demonstrated that by using this alternative data from both response formats turned out to be actually equivalent.
To be able to compare the frequencies of categorical scales with VAS, segments of the VAS have to be put together to form categories. Two ways of categorizing data have been examined. The first one consists in linear transformation, where equal intervals of the VAS are put together to form one category. This leads to equally spaced categories with same size and distance and represents the transfer of the VAS' characteristics onto categorical scales. The second way is the use of transformation with reduced extremes. The segments on the VAS that are put together to form the extreme categories are smaller here than the segments that form the other categories. Transformation with reduced extremes leads to greater correspondence with the frequencies on categorical scales and, all in all, is clearly superior to linear transformation. Since on VAS the extreme categories are represented by smaller intervals than the other categories, they appear to be less important to the respondent. This means that the centers of categories and categorical scales have different distances so that they are not perceived as equidistant.
In a second experiment - to take into account the reduced distances of the extreme categories - the categorical scales were optically modified according to the transformation procedure with reduced extremes. The space between the radio buttons (i.e. categories) is no longer the same but represents the reduced extremes. The distance between the outermost button and the adjoining one is smaller than the distance between the other buttons. The aim is to create a scale whose categories are perceived as having the same distances so that the required equidistance is no longer violated.
Access/Direct link Conference homepage (abstract)
Year of publication2006
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Full text availabilityNon-existant
Web survey bibliography - 2006 (98)
- Adult gadget ownership over time (2006-2012); 2012
- Dutch Online Panel Comparison Study (NOPVO); 2006; R. van Ossenbruggen; T. Vonk; P. Willems
- Migration Watch: an Internet survey to monitor spring migration in Britain and Ireland; 2006; Baillie, S. R., Balmer, D. E., Downie, I. S., Wright, K. H. M.
- Substance use and sexual behaviours of Japanese men who have sex with men: A nationwide internet survey...; 2006; Hidaka, Y., Ichikawa, S., Koyano, J., Urao, M., Yasuo, T., Kimura, H., Kihara, M., Ono-Kihara, M.
- Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing: Mode Effects on Data Quality and Likely Causes. Report...; 2006; Jaeckle, A., Lynn, P., Roberts, C.,
- DADOS-Survey: an open-source application for CHERRIES-compliant Web surveys; 2006; Shah, A., Jacobs, D. O., Martins, H., Harker, M., Menezes, A., Harker, M., McCready, M., Pietrobon,...
- Snowball Sampling ; 2006; Berg, S.
- Introduction nonresponse bias in household surveys ; 2006; Singer, E.
- Essential Steps for Web Surveys: A Guide to Designing, Administering and Utilizing Web Surveys for University...; 2006; Cheskis-Gold, R., Loescher, R., Shepard-Rabadam, E., Carroll, B.
- Don't make me think: a common sense approach to web usability; 2006; Krug, S.
- The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor Service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web...; 2006; Umefjord, G., Hamberg, K., Malker, H., Petersson, G.
- A short introduction to usability in online surveys; 2006; Kaczmirek, L.
- Measuring task-specific perceptions of the world wide web ; 2006; Page-Thomas, K.
- Oversurveying: Causes, Consequences, and Cures; 2006; Weiner, S. P., Dalessio, A. T.
- Online Reporting: Real Time, Real Impact, Real Opportunities ; 2006; Barbera, K. M., Young, S.
- Online Surveys: Critical Issues in Using the Web to Conduct Surveys; 2006; Fenlason, K., Suckow-Zimberg, K.
- Getting Action from Organizational Surveys: New Concepts, Technologies, and Applications; 2006; Kraut, A. I.
- Survey Methodology; 2006; Nusser, S. M.
- Web-based survey techniques. A synthesis of Transit practice; 2006
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- Understanding people. Sample matching; 2006; Rivers, D.
- The power of the visible: Visual design for Web surveys; 2006; Couper, M. P.
- The internet response method: Impact on the Canadian Census of population data; 2006; Roy, L., Laroche, D.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- The anonymous elect. Market research through online access panels; 2006; Postoaca, A.
- Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- Research quality: The next MR industry challenge; 2006; Dedeker, K.
- Optimizing quality in the use of web-based and computer based testing for personnel selection; 2006; Hornke, L. F., Kersting, M.
- Online marketing research; 2006; Miller, J.
- Need for high quality auxiliary data service for improving the quality of editing and imputation...; 2006; Laaksonen, S.
- Microsoft sues testing material vendors; 2006; Johnston, S. J.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on the ITC - Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing...; 2006; Coyne, I., Bartram, D.
- International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing; 2006
- How successful I am depends on what number I get: The effects of numerical scale labels and need for...; 2006; Yan, T.
- Greenfield unveils real-time sampling; 2006
- Global market research 2006; 2006
- F-Shaped pattern for reading web content; 2006; Nielsen, J.
- Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires. A confirmatory multigroup analysis; 2006; Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., Rost, D. H., Thiel, A.
- Benefits and challenges of multi-sourcing. Understanding differences between sample sources; 2006; de Gaudemar, O.
- Behavioral self-report measures. International extensions; 2006; Thomas, R. K., Klein, J. D.
- Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
- Assessing individual respondents' quality. An innovative scoring system; 2006; Loeb, C.,Hartmann, A.
- Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
- A Critical Assessment of Online Survey Tools; 2006; Marra, R. M., Bogue, B.
- A dynamic technique for conducting online survey-based research; 2006; Bonometti, R. J., Tang, J.
- The 2006 Confirmit Annual MR Software Survey; 2006; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Online community survey: an effectiveness measure for revealing citizen preferences in their role as...; 2006; Martin Juanil, D., Ismail, M.
- Blaise – Alive and kicking for 20 years; 2006; Bethlehem, J., Hofman, L.
- Physical or Virtual Presence of the Experimenter: Psychological Online-Experiments in Different Settings...; 2006; Ollesch, H., Heineken, E., Schulte, F. P.